Back to Search Start Over

Breeding seabirds as vectors of microplastics from sea to land: Evidence from colonies in Arctic Canada

Authors :
Julia E. Baak
Jesse C. Vermaire
Mark L. Mallory
Madelaine P.T. Bourdages
Jennifer F. Provencher
Source :
Science of The Total Environment. 764:142808
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

The presence and persistence of microplastics in the environment is increasingly recognized, however, how they are distributed throughout environmental systems requires further understanding. Seabirds have been identified as vectors of chemical contaminants from marine to terrestrial environments, and studies have recently identified seabirds as possible vectors of plastic pollution in the marine environment. However, their role in the distribution of microplastic pollution in the Arctic has yet to be explored. We examined two species of seabirds known to ingest plastics: northern fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis; n = 27) and thick-billed murres (Uria lomvia; n = 30) as potential vectors for the transport of microplastics in and around breeding colonies. Our results indicated anthropogenic particles in the faecal precursors of both species. Twenty-four anthropogenic particles were found in the fulmar faecal precursor samples (M = 0.89, SD = 1.09; 23 fibres and one fragment), and 10 anthropogenic particles were found in the murre faecal precursor samples (M = 0.33, SD = 0.92; 5 fibres, 4 fragments, and one foam). Through the use of bird population surveys and the quantification of anthropogenic particles found in the faecal precursors of sampled seabirds from the same colony, we estimate that fulmars and murres may deposit between 3.3 (CIboot 1.9 × 106–4.9 × 106) and 45.5 (CIboot 9.1 × 106–91.9 × 106) million anthropogenic particles, respectively, per year into the environment during their breeding period at these colonies. These estimates indicate that migratory seabirds could be contributing to the distribution and local hotspots of microplastics in Arctic environments, however, they are still likely a relatively small source of plastic pollution in terms of mass in the environment and may not contribute as much as other reported sources such as atmospheric deposition in the Arctic.

Details

ISSN :
00489697
Volume :
764
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Science of The Total Environment
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....048fe7c362b19327e81a28b0a843e1a2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142808