Back to Search Start Over

Comparative study on optical performance and visual outcomes between two diffractive multifocal lenses: AMO Tecnis ® ZMB00 and AcrySof ® IQ ReSTOR ® Multifocal IOL SN6AD1

Authors :
Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta
André Gustavo Rolim de Araújo
Celso Takashi Nakano
Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves
Wilson Takashi Hida
Milton Ruiz Alves
Patrick Frenzel Tzeliks
Michelle Rodrigues Gonçalves
Fernando de Bortoli Nogueira
Source :
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, Volume: 79, Issue: 3, Pages: 171-176, Published: JUN 2016, Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, Vol 79, Iss 3, Pp 171-176 (2016), Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.79 n.3 2016, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia, Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO), instacron:CBO
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the optical performance and visual outcomes between two diffractive multifocal lenses: AMO Tecnis® ZMB00 and AcrySof® ReSTOR® SN6AD1. Methods: This prospective, non-randomized comparative study included the assessment of 74 eyes in 37 patients referred for cataract surgery and candidates for multifocal intraocular lens implants. Exclusion criteria included existence of any other eye disease, previous eye surgery, high axial myopia, preoperative corneal astigmatism of >1.00 cylindrical diopter (D), and intraoperative or postoperative complications. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), with analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS), wavefront, and visual defocus curve. Results: Postoperative UDVA was 0.09 and 0.08 logMAR in the SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups, respectively (p=0.868); postoperative CDVA was 0.04 and 0.02 logMAR in the SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups, respectively (p=0.68); DCIVA was 0.17 and 0.54 logMAR in the SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups, respectively (p=0.000); and DCNVA was 0.04 and 0.09 logMAR in the SN6AD1 and ZMB00 groups, respectively (p=0.001). In both cases, there was an improvement in the spherical equivalent and UDVA (p0,05). O grupo SN6AD1 obteve valor de 0,04 logMAR e o grupo ZMB00 de 0,09 logMAR para DCNVA (p

Details

ISSN :
16782925
Volume :
79
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0420ac40f56978cf31c501f6cac28fab