Back to Search Start Over

Prospective validation of the 4C prognostic models for adults hospitalised with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol

Authors :
Knight, Stephen R
Gupta, Rishi K
Ho, Antonia
Pius, Riinu
Buchan, Iain
Carson, Gail
Drake, Thomas M
Dunning, Jake
Fairfield, Cameron J
Gamble, Carrol
Green, Christopher A
Halpin, Sophie
Hardwick, Hayley E
Holden, Karl A
Horby, Peter W
Jackson, Clare
Mclean, Kenneth A
Merson, Laura
Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S
Norman, Lisa
Olliaro, Piero L
Pritchard, Mark G
Russell, Clark D
Shaw, Catherine A
Sheikh, Aziz
Solomon, Tom
Sudlow, Cathie
Swann, Olivia V
Turtle, Lance CW
Openshaw, Peter JM
Baillie, J Kenneth
Docherty, Annemarie
Semple, Malcolm G
Noursadeghi, Mahdad
Harrison, Ewen M
ISARIC Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (ISARIC4C) Investigators
ISARIC4C Investigators
Gupta, Rishi K [0000-0002-6257-1285]
Turtle, Lance CW [0000-0002-0778-1693]
Baillie, J Kenneth [0000-0001-5258-793X]
Semple, Malcolm G [0000-0001-9700-0418]
Noursadeghi, Mahdad [0000-0002-4774-0853]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
BMJ, 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively validate two risk scores to predict mortality (4C Mortality) and in-hospital deterioration (4C Deterioration) among adults hospitalised with COVID-19. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study of adults (age ≥18 years) with confirmed or highly suspected COVID-19 recruited into the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK (CCP-UK) study in 306 hospitals across England, Scotland and Wales. Patients were recruited between 27 August 2020 and 17 February 2021, with at least 4 weeks follow-up before final data extraction. The main outcome measures were discrimination and calibration of models for in-hospital deterioration (defined as any requirement of ventilatory support or critical care, or death) and mortality, incorporating predefined subgroups. RESULTS: 76 588 participants were included, of whom 27 352 (37.4%) deteriorated and 12 581 (17.4%) died. Both the 4C Mortality (0.78 (0.77 to 0.78)) and 4C Deterioration scores (pooled C-statistic 0.76 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.77)) demonstrated consistent discrimination across all nine National Health Service regions, with similar performance metrics to the original validation cohorts. Calibration remained stable (4C Mortality: pooled slope 1.09, pooled calibration-in-the-large 0.12; 4C Deterioration: 1.00, -0.04), with no need for temporal recalibration during the second UK pandemic wave of hospital admissions. CONCLUSION: Both 4C risk stratification models demonstrate consistent performance to predict clinical deterioration and mortality in a large prospective second wave validation cohort of UK patients. Despite recent advances in the treatment and management of adults hospitalised with COVID-19, both scores can continue to inform clinical decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN66726260.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....03415adb5bef9f2053ee47135b33b929