Back to Search Start Over

Multicentre Evaluation of an Extra Low Dose Protocol to Reduce Radiation Exposure in Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenting

Authors :
Iannis Ben Abdallah
Olivier Corcos
Sebastien Leygnac
Yves Castier
Ambroise Duprey
Nicolas Massiot
Salma El Batti
Laboratoire de Recherche Vasculaire Translationnelle (LVTS (UMR_S_1148 / U1148))
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Paris (UP)-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord
Source :
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Elsevier, 2020, 60, pp.925-931. ⟨10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.08.005⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Objective Radiation dose in mesenteric stenting (MS) remains under evaluated. Yet, MS can lead to high levels of radiation mainly because lateral angulation is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an extra low dose protocol (ELDP) to reduce radiation exposure in MS. Methods From November 2017 to November 2019, all patients presenting with either acute or chronic atherosclerotic mesenteric ischaemia treated by antegrade MS using either fixed or mobile imaging systems in three university hospitals were included. In November 2018, an ELDP including ≤3 frames/s fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was introduced. Prospectively enrolled ELDP patients (Nov 2018–Nov 2019) were compared with retrospectively captured patients (Historical group, Nov 2017–Nov 2018). Radiation data including dose area product (DAP), cumulative air kerma (CAK), and fluoroscopy time (FT) were analysed. Results Overall, 46 patients (median age 73 years [63–72], 59% males) were included (ELDP group, n = 21; Historical group, n = 25). Thirty-three patients (72%) underwent MS in a hybrid room. Median DAP (ELDP group, 10 [4.7–26] Gy.cm2 vs. Historical group, 45 [24–88] Gy.cm2, p = .002), median CAK (ELDP group, 170 [58–260] vs. Historical group, 262 [152–460], p = .037), and median number of DSA runs (ELDP group, 4 [1.5–5] vs. Historical group, 5.5 [3.7–5], p = .030) were statistically significantly lower in patients receiving the ELDP, whereas median FT (ELDP group, 16 min [11–23] vs. Historical group, 14 min [9–25], p = .71) and technical success (ELDP group, 95%; Historical group, 92%, p = .65) were not statistically significantly different between groups. Conclusion MS exposes both patients and physicians to a high ionising radiation dose. Awareness of radiation safety and seeking dose reduction is paramount in these highly irradiating procedures. The use of ELDP significantly reduces radiation without compromising technical success.

Details

ISSN :
10785884
Volume :
60
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....02f3dac926fed8bb9ca3ae41c5b3c8f3