Back to Search Start Over

Risk Prediction for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in 11 United States-Based Case-Control Studies: Incorporation of Epidemiologic Risk Factors and 17 Confirmed Genetic Loci

Authors :
Anna H. Wu
Joellen M. Schildkraut
Daniel O. Stram
Roberta B. Ness
Robert P. Edwards
Marc T. Goodman
Celeste Leigh Pearce
Alice S. Whittemore
Rachel Palmieri Weber
Pamela J. Thompson
Andrew Berchuck
Julie M. Cunningham
Mary Anne Rossing
Thomas A. Sellers
Weiva Sieh
Shelley S. Tworoger
Jennifer A. Doherty
Daniel W. Cramer
Elisa V. Bandera
Galina Lurie
Francesmary Modugno
Nicolas Wentzensen
Merlise A. Clyde
Harvey A. Risch
Kathryn L. Terry
Kristine G. Wicklund
Robert A. Vierkant
Hoda Anton-Culver
Michael E. Carney
Ellen L. Goode
Kara L. Cushing-Haugen
Edwin S. Iversen
Elizabeth M. Poole
Brooke L. Fridley
Valerie McGuire
Sara H. Olson
Malcolm C. Pike
Argyrios Ziogas
Joseph H. Rothstein
Kirsten B. Moysich
Source :
Scopus-Elsevier
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Previously developed models for predicting absolute risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have included a limited number of risk factors and have had low discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) < 0.60). Because of this, we developed and internally validated a relative risk prediction model that incorporates 17 established epidemiologic risk factors and 17 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using data from 11 case-control studies in the United States (5,793 cases; 9,512 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (data accrued from 1992 to 2010). We developed a hierarchical logistic regression model for predicting case-control status that included imputation of missing data. We randomly divided the data into an 80% training sample and used the remaining 20% for model evaluation. The AUC for the full model was 0.664. A reduced model without SNPs performed similarly (AUC = 0.649). Both models performed better than a baseline model that included age and study site only (AUC = 0.563). The best predictive power was obtained in the full model among women younger than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.714); however, the addition of SNPs increased the AUC the most for women older than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.638 vs. 0.616). Adapting this improved model to estimate absolute risk and evaluating it in prospective data sets is warranted.

Details

ISSN :
14766256
Volume :
184
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American journal of epidemiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....02ce3aa95ecf51734f03182f1568aa44