Exploring the Meaning of Chronic Rejection After Lung Transplantation and Its Impact on Clinical Management and Caregiving

Although the literature continues to portray chronic rejection after lung transplantation as ominous with no known treatment, no studies have examined family and clinician caregivers' perceptions of the diagnosis of chronic rejection and its impact on the course of clinical care. We explored the meaning and impact of chronic rejection from the perspective of family (n=10) and clinician (n=3) caregivers. We found that family caregivers considered the onset of chronic rejection to be inevitable, irreversible, unpredictable, and going back to pretransplant. Clinicians considered chronic rejection as a harbinger of deterioration and peril and expressed trepidation about informing recipients and their family caregivers about the diagnosis. Despite the heightened caregiving duties and challenges of treating chronic rejection, its unpredictable course and the prospect of retransplant instilled hope for stabilization or cure among most clinicians and caregivers, leading them to support recipients' wishes to pursue potentially futile treatments. Until recipients were no longer competent, caregivers believed all treatment options (including retransplant) had been exhausted, or suffering was prolonged, caregivers were reluctant to halt extraordinary treatment measures. Caregivers perceived that certainty regarding poor prognosis was required for palliative care and that palliative care was end-of-life care. Consequently, trials of aggressive treatment typically precluded palliative care.