Back to Search
Start Over
Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment: A multi-model comparison
- Source :
- Field Crops Research, Field Crops Research, Elsevier, 2017, 202, pp.21-35. ⟨10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009⟩, Field Crops Research, 2017, 202, pp.21-35. ⟨10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009⟩, Webber, H, Martre, P, Asseng, S, Kimball, B, White, J W, Ottman, M, Wall, G W, De Sanctis, G, Doltra, J, Grant, R F, Kassie, B, Maiorana, A, Olesen, J E, Ripoche, D, Rezaei, E E, Semenov, M A, Stratonovitch, P & Ewert, F 2017, ' Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment: A multi-model comparison ', Field Crops Research, vol. 202, pp. 21-35 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009
- Publisher :
- Elsevier
-
Abstract
- Even brief periods of high temperatures occurring around flowering and during grain filling can severely reduce grain yield in cereals. Recently, ecophysiological and crop models have begun to represent such phenomena. Most models use air temperature (T-air) in their heat stress responses despite evidence that crop canopy temperature (T-c) better explains grain yield losses. T-c can deviate significantly from T-air based on climatic factors and the crop water status. The broad objective of this study was to evaluate whether simulation of T-c improves the ability of crop models to simulate heat stress impacts on wheat under irrigated conditions. Nine process-based models, each using one of three broad approaches (empirical, EMP; energy balance assuming neutral atmospheric stability, EBN; and energy balance correcting for the atmospheric stability conditions, EBSC) to simulate To simulated grain yield under a range of temperature conditions. The models varied widely in their ability to reproduce the measured T-c with the commonly used EBN models performing much worse than either EMP or EBSC. Use of T-c to account for heat stress effects did improve simulations compared to using only T-air to a relatively minor extent, but the models that additionally use T-c on various other processes as well did not have better yield simulations. Models that simulated yield well under heat stress had varying skill in simulating T-c For example, the EBN models had very poor simulations of T-c but performed very well in simulating grain yield. These results highlight the need to more systematically understand and model heat stress events in wheat.
- Subjects :
- Canopy
stress thermique
[SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences
Yield (engineering)
ble tendre
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
comparaison de modèles
Energy balance
Soil Science
Grain filling
Canopy temperature
Atmospheric sciences
01 natural sciences
heat stress
high temperature
Crop model comparison
crop model comparison
Atmospheric instability
climat semi aride
condition environnementale
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
semi arid climate
2. Zero hunger
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
Arid
canopy temperature
Heat stress
Agronomy
soft wheat
13. Climate action
Semi-arid climate
Wheat
040103 agronomy & agriculture
rendement agricole
0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries
Environmental science
haute température
Agronomy and Crop Science
modèle multifactoriel
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 03784290
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Field Crops Research, Field Crops Research, Elsevier, 2017, 202, pp.21-35. ⟨10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009⟩, Field Crops Research, 2017, 202, pp.21-35. ⟨10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009⟩, Webber, H, Martre, P, Asseng, S, Kimball, B, White, J W, Ottman, M, Wall, G W, De Sanctis, G, Doltra, J, Grant, R F, Kassie, B, Maiorana, A, Olesen, J E, Ripoche, D, Rezaei, E E, Semenov, M A, Stratonovitch, P & Ewert, F 2017, ' Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment: A multi-model comparison ', Field Crops Research, vol. 202, pp. 21-35 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0219e898058b20c3a510b7baba7334f2
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009