Comparison of recombinant Trypanosoma cruzi peptide mixtures versus multiepitope chimeric proteins as sensitizing antigens for immunodiagnosis

The aim of this work was to determine the best strategy to display antigens (Ags) on immunochemical devices to improve test selectivity and sensitivity. We comparatively evaluated five Trypanosoma cruzi antigenic recombinant peptides, chose the three more sensitive ones, built up chimeras bearing these selected Ags, and systematically compared by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay the performance of the assortments of those peptides with that of the multiepitope constructions bearing all those peptides lineally fused. The better-performing Ags that were compared included peptides homologous to the previously described T. cruzi flagellar repetitive Ag (here named RP1), shed acute-phase Ag (RP2), B13 (RP5), and the chimeric recombinant proteins CP1 and CP2, bearing repetitions of RP1-RP2 and RP1-RP2-RP5, respectively. The diagnostic performances of these Ags were assessed for discrimination efficiency by the formula +OD/cutoff value (where +OD is the mean optical density value of the positive serum samples tested), in comparison with each other either alone, in mixtures, or as peptide-fused chimeras and with total parasite homogenate (TPH). The discrimination efficiency values obtained for CP1 and CP2 were 25% and 52% higher, respectively, than those of their individual-Ag mixtures. CP2 was the only Ag that showed enhanced discrimination efficiency between Chagas´ disease-positive and -negative samples, compared with TPH. This study highlights the convenience of performing immunochemical assays using hybrid, single-molecule, chimeric Ags instead of peptide mixtures. CP2 preliminary tests rendered 98.6% sensitivity when evaluated with a 141-Chagas´ disease-positive serum sample panel and 99.4% specificity when assessed with a 164-Chagas´ disease-negative serum sample panel containing 15 samples from individuals infected with Leishmania spp. Fil: Camussone, Cecilia María. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas. Instituto de Tecnología Biológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: González, Verónica Doris Guadalupe. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas. Instituto de Tecnología Biológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Belluzo, María Soledad. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Departamento de Química Analítica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Pujato, Nazarena. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas. Instituto de Tecnología Biológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Ribone, María Élida. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Departamento de Química Analítica; Argentina Fil: Lagier, Claudia Marina. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Departamento de Química Analítica; Argentina Fil: Marcipar, Iván Sergio. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas. Instituto de Tecnología Biológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina