Back to Search
Start Over
Trade-offs between carbon stocks and biodiversity in European temperate forests
- Source :
- Global Change Biology, Global Change Biology, Wiley, 2019, 25 (2), pp.536-548. ⟨10.1111/gcb.14503⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Policies to mitigate climate change and biodiversity loss often assume that protecting carbon-rich forests provides co-benefits in terms of biodiversity, due to the spatial congruence of carbon stocks and biodiversity at biogeographic scales. However, it remains unclear whether this holds at the scales relevant for management, with particularly large knowledge gaps for temperate forests and for taxa other than trees. We built a comprehensive dataset of Central European temperate forest structure and multi-taxonomic diversity (beetles, birds, bryophytes, fungi, lichens, and plants) across 352 plots. We used Boosted Regression Trees to assess the relationship between above-ground live carbon stocks and (a) taxon-specific richness, (b) a unified multidiversity index. We used Threshold Indicator Taxa ANalysis to explore individual species' responses to changing above-ground carbon stocks and to detect change-points in species composition along the carbon-stock gradient. Our results reveal an overall weak and highly variable relationship between richness and carbon stock at the stand scale, both for individual taxonomic groups and for multidiversity. Similarly, the proportion of win-win and trade-off species (i.e. species favored or disadvantaged by increasing carbon stock, respectively) varied substantially across taxa. Win-win species gradually replaced trade-off species with increasing carbon, without clear thresholds along the above-ground carbon gradient, suggesting that community-level surrogates (e.g. richness) might fail to detect critical changes in biodiversity. Collectively, our analyses highlight that leveraging co-benefits between carbon and biodiversity in temperate forest may require stand-scale management that prioritizes either biodiversity or carbon-in order to maximize co-benefits at broader scales. Importantly, this contrasts with tropical forests, where climate [...]<br />Pre-review Version 2018, 07\23 + Supplementary information 43 Pages, 5 figures + 9 supplementary Figures
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
biodiversity conservation
carbon storage
climate change mitigation
community thresholds
multi-objective forest planning
multi-taxonomic diversity
trade-off species
win-win species
Global and Planetary Change
Environmental Chemistry
Ecology
2300
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
Biodiversity
MULTI‐TAXONOMIC DIVERSITY
Forests
01 natural sciences
COMMUNITY THRESHOLDS
CHAMPIGNON
CARBON STORAGE
Taxonomic rank
Lichen
General Environmental Science
Temperate forest
win-win specie
Geography
Italy
[SDE]Environmental Sciences
France
Temperate rainforest
Climate Change
Climate change
WIN‐WIN SPECIES
010603 evolutionary biology
MULTI‐OBJECTIVE FOREST PLANNING
Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Hungary
trade-off specie
TRADE‐OFF SPECIES
community threshold
Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE)
15. Life on land
Carbon
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Taxon
13. Climate action
FOS: Biological sciences
Species richness
GROUPE TAXONOMIQUE
carbon
biodiversity
climate change
forests
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 13541013 and 13652486
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Global Change Biology, Global Change Biology, Wiley, 2019, 25 (2), pp.536-548. ⟨10.1111/gcb.14503⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....010fa55950fe036d6b3693bf3e7f99be