Back to Search Start Over

Is pre-operative urodynamic bladder function the true predictor of outcome of male sling for post prostatectomy incontinence?

Authors :
Sachin Malde
Lap Yan Leung
Tamsin Greenwell
Jeremy Ockrim
Davendra Sharma
Raveen Saigal
Arun Sahai
Claire Taylor
Bogdan Toia
Eskinder Solomon
Jai Seth
Rizwan Hamid
Source :
World Journal of Urology
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer, 2021.

Abstract

Purpose To investigate pre-operative urodynamic parameters in male sling patients to ascertain whether this might better predict surgical outcomes and facilitate patient selection. Methods We performed a retrospective, case notes and video-urodynamics, review of men who underwent AdVanceXP male sling in three London hospitals between 2012 and 2019. Urodynamics were performed in all centres, while retrograde leak point pressure (RLPP) was performed in one centre. Results Successful outcome was seen in 99/130 (76%) of men who required one pad or less per day. The dry rate was 51%. Pad usage was linked to worse surgical outcomes, mean 2.6 (range 1–6.5) for success vs 3.6 (range 1–10) although the ranges were wide (p = 0.002). 24 h pad weight also reached statistical significance (p = 0.05), with a mean of 181 g for success group versus 475 g for the non-successful group. The incidence of DO in the non-successful group was significantly higher than in successful group (55% versus 29%, p = 0.0009). Bladder capacity less than 250 ml was also associated with worse outcomes (p = 0.003). Reduced compliance was not correlated with outcomes (31% for success groups vs 45% for non-successful group, p = 0.15). Preoperative RLPP was performed in 60/130 patients but did not independently reach statistical significance (p = 0.25). Conclusion Urodynamic parameters related to bladder function—detrusor overactivity and reduced maximum cystometric capacity predict male sling outcomes and may help in patient selection for male sling (or sphincter) surgery; whereas urodynamic parameters of sphincter incompetency (RLPP) were not predictive. Further larger scale studies are required to confirm these findings.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14338726
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
World Journal of Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....009fd022047014490e0fe74646befa4a