Back to Search Start Over

Reduced Cognitive and Psychomotor Impairment with Extended-Release Oxymorphone Versus Controlled-Release Oxycodone

Authors :
Kerri A. Schoedel
Source :
Pain Physician. :561-573
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, 2010.

Abstract

Background: Opioids provide effective pain control, yet have risks including adverse events (AEs) (e.g., constipation, nausea/vomiting, sedation) and cognitive/psychomotor effects. Objective: To compare cognitive and psychomotor effects of oxymorphone extended release (OM-ER) versus oxycodone controlled release (OC-CR). Study design: Randomized, double-blind, 5-way crossover Setting: Single inpatient research unit Methods: Nondependent recreational opioid users were administered single intact oral tablets of placebo, OM-ER (15 and 30 mg), and OC-CR (30 and 60 mg), separated by a 7- to 21-day washout. The divided attention (DA) test measured psychomotor impairment (e.g., manual tracking [e.g., percentage over road], target accuracy [e.g., target hits], reaction time [hit latency]). Visual analog scales measured alertness/drowsiness, agitation/relaxation, and dizziness. Sedative, stimulant, and dysphoric effects were measured using the Addiction Research Center Inventory PentobarbitalChlorpromazine-Alcohol (PCAG), Benzedrine Group (BG), and Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) scales, respectively. Comparisons were made between equianalgesic doses (OM-ER 15 mg vs OCCR 30 mg; OM-ER 30 mg vs OC-CR 60 mg), within active drug doses, and between active drugs and placebo using least squares (LS) mean difference of the peak maximum (Emax) or minimum (Emin) effect using linear mixed model analysis of covariance. Results: Thirty-five participants received all 5 treatments. Peak cognitive and psychomotor impairment (LS mean [SE]) was less with OM-ER than equianalgesic doses of OC-CR for reaction time (Emax hit latency, longer if impaired; 571.2 [13.4] vs 588.1 ms [13.4], P=0.03 for OM-ER 15 mg vs OC-CR 30 mg, respectively; 572.4 [13.4] vs 604.3 ms [13.4], P

Details

ISSN :
21501149 and 15333159
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pain Physician
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........f9e8c8fbe85256b08d1318693d658844
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2010/13/561