Back to Search Start Over

US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations

Authors :
Gio B. Gori
Michael Aschner
Christopher J. Borgert
Samuel M. Cohen
Daniel R. Dietrich
Corrado L. Galli
Helmut Greim
John S. Heslop-Harrison
Sam Kacew
Norbert E. Kaminski
James E. Klaunig
Hans W.J. Marquardt
Olavi Pelkonen
Ruth Roberts
Kai M. Savolainen
Aristidis Tsatsakis
Hiroshi Yamazaki
Source :
Archives of Toxicology. 97:1813-1822
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2023.

Abstract

The 1958 Delaney amendment to the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act prohibited food additives causing cancer in animals by appropriate tests. Regulators responded by adopting chronic lifetime cancer tests in rodents, soon challenged as inappropriate, for they led to very inconsistent results depending on the subjective choice of animals, test design and conduct, and interpretive assumptions. Presently, decades of discussions and trials have come to conclude it is impossible to translate chronic animal data into verifiable prospects of cancer hazards and risks in humans. Such conclusion poses an existential crisis for official agencies in the US and abroad, which for some 65 years have used animal tests to justify massive regulations of alleged human cancer hazards, with aggregated costs of $trillions and without provable evidence of public health advantages. This article addresses suitable remedies for the US and potentially worldwide, by critically exploring the practices of regulatory agencies vis-á-vis essential criteria for validating scientific evidence. According to this analysis, regulations of alleged cancer hazards and risks have been and continue to be structured around arbitrary default assumptions at odds with basic scientific and legal tests of reliable evidence. Such practices raise a manifold ethical predicament for being incompatible with basic premises of the US Constitution, and with the ensuing public expectations of testable truth and transparency from government agencies. Potential remedies in the US include amendments to the US Administrative Procedures Act, preferably requiring agencies to justify regulations compliant with the Daubert opinion of the Daubert ruling of the US Supreme Court, which codifies the criteria defining reliable scientific evidence. International reverberations are bound to follow what remedial actions may be taken in the US, the origin of current world regulatory procedures to control alleged cancer causing agents.

Details

ISSN :
14320738 and 03405761
Volume :
97
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Archives of Toxicology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........f93d8c4c20fda41ae2780a1ad9e33486
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03429-5