Controversy and debate: Memory-Based Methods Paper 1: the fatal flaws of food frequency questionnaires and other memory-based dietary assessment methods

MLA

Carl J. Lavie, et al. “Controversy and Debate: Memory-Based Methods Paper 1: The Fatal Flaws of Food Frequency Questionnaires and Other Memory-Based Dietary Assessment Methods.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 104, Dec. 2018, pp. 113–24. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.003.

APA

Carl J. Lavie, Michael L. Marlow, & Edward Archer. (2018). Controversy and debate: Memory-Based Methods Paper 1: the fatal flaws of food frequency questionnaires and other memory-based dietary assessment methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 104, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.003

Chicago

Carl J. Lavie, Michael L. Marlow, and Edward Archer. 2018. “Controversy and Debate: Memory-Based Methods Paper 1: The Fatal Flaws of Food Frequency Questionnaires and Other Memory-Based Dietary Assessment Methods.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 104 (December): 113–24. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.003.