Solar EUV and Electron-Proton-Hydrogen Atom-Produced Ionosphere on Mars: Comparative Studies of Particle Fluxes and Ion Production Rates Due to Different Processes

The total photoelectron and secondary electron fluxes are calculated at different times and altitudes along the trajectory of Mars Global Surveyor passing through the nightside and dayside martian ionosphere. These results are compared with the electron reflectometer experiment on board Mars Global Surveyor. The calculated electron spectra are in good agreement with this measurement. However, the combined fluxes of proton and hydrogen atom as calculated by E. Kallio and P. Janhunen (2001, J. Geophys. Res.106, 5617–5634) were found to be 1–2 orders of magnitude smaller than the measured spectra. We have also calculated ionization rates and ion and electron densities due to solar EUV, X-ray, and electron–proton–hydrogen atom impacting with atmospheric gases of Mars at solar zenith angles of 75°, 105°, and 127°. In the vicinity of the dayside ionization peak, it is found that the ion production rate caused by the precipitation of proton–hydrogen atom is larger than the X-ray impact ionization rate while at all altitudes, the photoionization rate is always greater than either of the two. Moreover, X-rays contribute greatly to the photoelectron impact ionization rate as compared to the photoion production rate. The calculated electron densities are compared with radio occultation measurements made by Mars Global Surveyor, Viking 1, and Mars 5 spacecraft at these solar zenith angles. The dayside ionosphere produced by proton–hydrogen atom is smaller by an order of magnitude than that produced by solar EUV radiation. X-rays play a significant role in the dayside ionosphere of Mars at the altitude range 100–120 km. Solar wind electrons and protons provide a substantial source for the nightside ionosphere. These calculations are carried out for a solar minimum period using solar wind electron flux, photon flux, neutral densities, and temperatures under nearly the same areophysical conditions as the measurements.