Cite
Benefits of hemodynamic pacing. DDD closed loop stimulation vs. conventional DDDR pacing
MLA
M. Alviti, et al. “Benefits of Hemodynamic Pacing. DDD Closed Loop Stimulation vs. Conventional DDDR Pacing.” EP Europace, Jan. 2001. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/eupace/2.supplement_1.a63-b.
APA
M. Alviti, R. Audoglio, Paolo Zecchi, Fulvio Bellocci, & Tommaso Sanna. (2001). Benefits of hemodynamic pacing. DDD closed loop stimulation vs. conventional DDDR pacing. EP Europace. https://doi.org/10.1016/eupace/2.supplement_1.a63-b
Chicago
M. Alviti, R. Audoglio, Paolo Zecchi, Fulvio Bellocci, and Tommaso Sanna. 2001. “Benefits of Hemodynamic Pacing. DDD Closed Loop Stimulation vs. Conventional DDDR Pacing.” EP Europace, January. doi:10.1016/eupace/2.supplement_1.a63-b.