Back to Search Start Over

10 Recommended core outcome domains for tendinopathy derived from a delphi of patients and health care professionals: the groningen ISTS2018 consensus

Authors :
Adam Weir
Roald Bahr
Inge van den Akker-Scheek
Cathy Speed
Håkan Alfredson
Ebonie Rio
Siu Ngor Fu
Edwin H.G. Oei
Bill Vicenzino
Nicola Maffulli
Andrew Carr
Jeremy Lewis
S. Peter Magnusson
Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Jill Cook
Robert-Jan de Vos
Jennifer Moriatis Wolf
Aex Scot
Johannes Zwerver
Brooke K. Coombes
Jonathan D Rees
Alison Grimaldi
Peter Malliaras
Craig Purdam
Seán McAuliffe
Source :
Abstracts.
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine, 2019.

Abstract

Introduction Tendinopathy (local tendon pain associated with physical activity) is a challenge to treat despite recent advances. One factor contributing to this challenge is our limited ability to synthesise/meta-analyse research findings, which is further compounded by a lack of valid outcome measures. We determined the core outcome domains against which outcome measures could be recommended. Materials and methods We conducted a Delphi study of patients and health care professionals (HCP) in two parts: an online survey and consensus meeting. Online survey items were extracted from clinical trial reports. Agree, disagree, or unsure were options in response to: ‘The ‘item’ is important enough to be included in a core domain set of tendinopathy’. A-priori criterion of ≥70% participant agreement was deemed for selection of a core domain. Results 32 patients and 28 HCP (92% had >10 years of tendinopathy experience, 71% consulted >10 cases per month) completed the online survey. 2 patients and 15 HCP attended the consensus meeting. Of the original 24 items (from trial reports); 9 were core: Patient overall rating, participation, pain on activity/loading, disability, function, physical function capacity, quality of life, psychology, and pain over a specified timeframe. Eight items were not core domains: range of motion, palpation, clinical examination, structure, pain on examination or without other specification, drop out, and sensory modality pain. Remaining seven items did not meet criterion. Conclusion The core domain set serves as a guide for reporting of outcomes in clinical trials. Further research should determine these outcomes for each specific tendon.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Abstracts
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........ec7474a1d27a0666f6ce48db9fd9d479
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-scandinavianabs.10