Back to Search Start Over

Single and Double Lung Transplantation Have Equivalent Functional Status Outcomes at One Year

Authors :
Neel K. Ranganath
Jad Malas
Deane E. Smith
Katherine G. Phillips
T.C. Geraci
Bonnie E. Lonze
Zachary N. Kon
Melissa Lesko
Luis F. Angel
Source :
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 38:S226
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

Purpose Controversy remains over the mortality benefit of single (SLT) versus double lung transplantation (DLT) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Independent of this controversy, hesitancy to perform SLT in this population exists on the basis of unclear one year functional status. We compared functional status at one year between IPF patients listed for both who ultimately received SLT or DLT. Methods All consecutive adult lung transplants for IPF provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were retrospectively reviewed (2007-2017). Isolated lobar transplants (n=4), patients listed only for SLT (n=1834) or DLT (n=2372), and patients with missing functional status data (n=715) were excluded. Group stratification was based on the ultimate procedure (SLT or DLT). Group propensity matching was performed based on 25 recipient/donor characteristics. We compared ‘good functional status’, defined as >70%, at one year. Results During the study period, 45% (660/1464) and 55% (804/1464) of patients listed for both procedures ultimately received SLT and DLT, respectively. After propensity matching, 341 matched patients remained in each group. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar (Table). There was no statistically significant difference in ‘good functional status’ at one year between SLT (77%, 264/341) and DLT (81%, 275/341) (p=0.301). The same trend is present for patients younger than 50 who receive SLT (82%, 23/28) versus DLT (94%, 34/36) (p=0.225), and patients between 50 and 60 who receive SLT (78%, 86/110) versus DLT (84%, 97/115) (p=0.305). The opposite trend is noted in patients older than 70 who receive SLT (72%, 13/18) versus DLT (61%, 11/18) (p=0.725). Conclusion In this cohort of lung transplant recipients listed for both SLT and DLT, functional status was statistically similar between groups, even in younger recipients. This data suggests that SLT should not be precluded in IPF patients on the basis of expected functional status at one year.

Details

ISSN :
10532498
Volume :
38
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........e91534df79ec3d9200e848fd37cb9671
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2019.01.555