Back to Search Start Over

Analysis of incidence and clinical outcomes in patients with thromboembolic events and invasive exocrine pancreatic cancer

Authors :
Gerald A. Soff
Stuart Gardos
David P. Kelsen
Andrew S. Epstein
Brian Denton
Eileen M. O'Reilly
Marinela Capanu
Christopher Crosbie
Manish A. Shah
Source :
Cancer. 118:3053-3061
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Wiley, 2011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is among the most common malignancies associated with thromboembolic events (TEs); however, reported incidence figures vary significantly and contain small patient cohorts. Pancreatic cancer-specific thrombosis studies examining the correlation between clinical variables, including thrombosis timing and the impact of thrombosis on survival, have not been reported. METHODS: Survival analyses were performed relating to the development and timing of a TE in 1915 patients administered chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with invasive exocrine pancreatic cancer from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2009. TE timing, relative to clinical parameters including laboratory data, erythropoietin-stimulating agent use, and body mass index (BMI), were also analyzed. RESULTS: A thrombosis was identified in 690 (36%) patients. After adjusting for patients with pancreatic surgery and thrombosis (n = 127), developing a TE significantly increased the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-2.8; P < .01). Patients with an early TE (within 1.5 months from pancreatic cancer diagnosis) had a significantly higher risk of death (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.7-2.5; P < .01) compared with patients with late TE or no TE. Erythropoietin-stimulating agent use and an elevated international normalized ratio were associated with significantly shorter time to thrombosis. Low BMI was associated with significantly longer time to thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: TEs are common in exocrine pancreatic cancer, with coagulopathy, erythropoietin-stimulating agent use, and underweight BMI influencing thrombosis timing. TEs, particularly early ones, confer a significantly worse prognosis, suggesting a biological significance, underscoring the relevance of ongoing prophylaxis trials, and raising the question of whether early TEs should be considered a stratification factor for clinical trials. Cancer 2012;118: 3053–61. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Details

ISSN :
0008543X
Volume :
118
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........e8bd89ea6609586c6b1262400406655e