Back to Search
Start Over
Parental Perceptions of Counseling Regarding Interpregnancy Interval after Stillbirth or Neonatal Death
- Source :
- American Journal of Perinatology.
- Publication Year :
- 2023
- Publisher :
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2023.
-
Abstract
- Objective Although guidelines exist regarding optimal interpregnancy interval (IPI) after live birth, both optimal IPI and counseling regarding recommended IPI (rIPI) after stillbirth or neonatal death is not well established. Our goal was to describe the counseling bereaved parents receive regarding IPI, parents' reactions to that counseling, and actual IPI after loss. Study Design Bereaved parents who had a previous pregnancy result in stillbirth or neonatal death participated in a web-based survey. Questions included demographics, details of stillbirth or neonatal death, IPI counseling, and pregnancy after loss. Demographic information, rIPI, and ac'tual IPI were reported using descriptive statistics. The Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used to test the association between rIPI and mode of delivery. The Spearman's correlation was used to test the association between rIPI and maternal age. Results A total of 275 surveys were analyzed. Mean gestational age of stillbirth delivery was 33.1 (standard deviation: 6.6) weeks. A total of 29% delivered via cesarean. Median rIPI was 6 (interquartile ratio [IQR]: 2–9) months, with the primary reason for IPI reported as the need to heal (74%). Delivery via cesarean was associated with longer rIPI, 9 versus 4.2 months (p Conclusion Bereaved parents receive a wide range of counseling regarding rIPI. The majority receive rIPI and pursue actual IPI shorter than current national and international recommendations for optimal IPI. Key Points
- Subjects :
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10988785 and 07351631
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- American Journal of Perinatology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........e7ab779be259587e5f08697dfa973780
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2053-8189