Primary surgery versus no surgery in synchronous metastastic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes of the ABCSG 28 Posytive trial

1074 Background: The ABCSG 28 Posytive trial compared primary surgery versus primary systemic therapy without surgery in synchronous metastatic breast cancer. The primary aim of the study was to investigate whether immediate resection of the primary tumor followed by standard systemic therapy improves median survival compared with no surgical resection (NCT01015625). This report describes quality-of-life (QoL) results. Methods: Patients were randomized between 2011 and 2015. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR 23 before treatment and every 6 months during follow-up. Results: 90 patients (45 with surgery, 45 with primary systemic therapy without surgery) from 15 centers were included in the QoL analysis. At 6 months patients after surgery reported more insomnia, breast symptoms and arm symptoms than patients without surgery, but these differences were no longer present at later follow-up visits. In the univariate and multivariate analysis the global health status and physical functioning scales of EORTC QLQ C30 were statistically significant predictors for OS and TTP (p < 0.05). Over a 24-month follow-up, patients > 60 years showed more QoL impairments than those < 60 years, independent of treatment. Patients < 60 years had better physical functioning and less fatigue, appetite loss, constipation and breast symptoms than older patients. There were no differences in QoL between patients with bone metastases vs those with visceral ± bone metastases. Conclusions: In patients with primary metastatic breast cancer primary surgery does not appear to improve QoL. Global health status and physical functioning scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 appears to be a predictive factor for OS and TTP. Clinical trial information: NCT01015625.