The prostate cancer survivorship program: A new concept for holistic long-term support and follow-up

72 Background: Previously cancer follow-up was based in secondary care. Survivors were seen in overburdened clinics, receiving brief clinic appointments and limited holistic care. We have piloted a new community based model in prostate cancer survivors in order to reduce service load. Patients are discharged from clinic, and entered into a specially developed web based database. This reviews PSA results, triggers alerts, resulting in specialist nurses (CNS) bringing patients back to clinic. This is supplemented by an annual survivorship conference, where patients have access to heathcare professionals. Patients also have access to community based services including a newly built community centre for patients where they have access to a range of healthcare professionals, ranging from dieticians to psychologists. We present our results, and evaluate this model independently with Pickering Institute patient questionnaires distributed one month pre and post conference and focus groups to develop further recommendations for the programme. Methods: We have developed a team composed of a consultant urological lead, commissioners, a GP, a specialist nurse, patient representatives and an IT specialist. Patients were entered into this programme over the past 1 year (323 so far). Inclusion criteria specify patients must be: 2 years post radical prostatectomy (unrecordable PSA), 3 years post radical radiotherapy with/ without hormones or 3 years post brachytherapy (both with stable PSA) according to the Phoenix criteria. Results: Patients completed an outcome questionnaire before the conference and one month afterwards (55 in total). Perceived control pre-conference was 7.19, post conference 7.38. Concern pre-conference was 3.56, 3.46 post conference. Understanding pre-conference was 7.49, 7.85 post-conference. Focus Group Results: The advantages of community based follow up were having an approachable primary contact, speedy referral, saving time, money and stress over prolonged waits and brief hospital appointments. Conclusions: We discuss how the programme can be developed, including: PSA feedback, a buddying system, and how this can be put into use across other tumour sites and other specialities.