P3578Determinants of visual-functional mismatches as assessed by coronary angiography and 3-D angiography-based quantitative flow ratio

Background Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)-based computational index that can estimate fractional flow reserve (FFR) without pharmacologically induced hyperemia or the use of a pressure wire. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the determinants of visual-functional mismatches between conventional two-dimensional QCA and QFR. Methods A total of 504 de novo intermediate-to-severe lesions from 504 patients with stable angina who underwent angiographical and physiological assessments were analyzed. All lesions were divided into four groups based on the significance of visual (QCA-diameter stenosis [DS] >50% and ≤50%) and functional (QFR Results Among 504 lesions, 153 lesions (30.4%) showed concordantly negative (DS ≤50% and QFR >0.80) and 170 lesions (33.7%) showed concordantly positive (DS >50% and QFR ≤0.80) visual and functional assessments. Among 181 lesions (35.9%) with discordant results, 75 lesions (14.9%) showed a mismatch (DS >50% and QFR >0.80) and 106 lesions (21.0%) showed a reverse mismatch (DS ≤50% and QFR ≤0.80), respectively. Reverse mismatch was associated with smaller reference diameter (odds ratio [OR] 0.561; P=0.036), greater DS (OR 1.039, P=0.013), lower coronary flow reserve (CFR) (OR 0.571, P Conclusions There was a high prevalence of visual-functional mismatches between QCA-DS and QFR, and CFR was an important functional factor of mismatches. Our results suggested the difference between predictors of reported visual-functional mismatches of QCA/FFR and those of QCA/QFR.