Back to Search Start Over

On Some Misinterpretations of the Instantaneous Reactive Power<tex>$phbox-q$</tex>Theory

Authors :
Leszek S. Czarnecki
Source :
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 19:828-836
Publication Year :
2004
Publisher :
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2004.

Abstract

The main features of the instantaneous reactive power (IRP) p-q theory, considered as a power theory of three-phase systems, are analyzed in this paper using the theory of the currents&#39; physical components (CPC). This analysis shows that the p and q powers are not associated with separate power phenomena, but with multiple phenomena. Moreover, the results of the IRP p-q theory contradict some common interpretations of power phenomena in three-phase circuits. Namely, according to the IRP p-q Theory the instantaneous reactive current can occur even if a load has zero reactive power, Q. Similarly, the instantaneous active current can occur even if a load has zero active power, P. Moreover, these two currents in circuits with a sinusoidal supply voltage can be nonsinusoidal even if there is no source of current distortion in the load. The analysis shows that a pair of values of instantaneous active and reactive p and q powers does not enable us to draw any conclusion with respect to the power properties of three-phase unbalanced loads even in a sinusoidal situation. Thus, the instantaneous reactive power p-q theory does not identify power properties of such loads instantaneously. This conclusion may have an importance for control algorithms of active power filters. The paper reveals the relationship between the p and q powers and the active, reactive and unbalanced powers, P, Q, and D and specifies the required energy storage capability of active power filters operated under sinusoidal unbalanced conditions.

Details

ISSN :
08858993
Volume :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........dd81667bef2d0e543e566961f7d49573
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2004.826500