Back to Search
Start Over
[Untitled]
- Source :
- Philosophical Studies. 112:69-91
- Publication Year :
- 2003
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2003.
-
Abstract
- In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam’s defenceof the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the faceof three standard arguments against it. These arguments are:the argument from hallucination; the argument from the samecause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptualtime-gap.
Details
- ISSN :
- 00318116
- Volume :
- 112
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Philosophical Studies
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........db4738511d008e3d4dde96e7a23d7b55
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022538609397