Back to Search
Start Over
Modularity of Mind
- Source :
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 47:132-144
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- SAGE Publications, 2016.
-
Abstract
- This article evaluates the idea of the modularity of mind and domain specificity. This concept has penetrated the behavioral disciplines, and in the case of some of these—for example, the cognitive study of religion—has even formed their foundation. Although the theoretical debate relating to the idea of modularity is ongoing, this debate has not been reflected in the use of modularity in behavioral research. The idea of domain specificity or modularity of mind is not without its controversies, and there is no consensus regarding its acceptance. Many neuroscientists, as well as several evolutionary psychologists and philosophers, have raised a number of objections that cannot remain overlooked. I will show the areas in which the idea is problematic, what attempts have been made to preserve it, and how social scientific research can move beyond post-Fodorian modularity without losing any valuable insights.
- Subjects :
- Modularity (networks)
05 social sciences
Philosophy of social science
Foundation (evidence)
Cognition
Domain specificity
050105 experimental psychology
Wason selection task
Epistemology
03 medical and health sciences
Philosophy
0302 clinical medicine
Modularity of mind
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Sociology
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15527441 and 00483931
- Volume :
- 47
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........d57fd4759739c3ddbf5e0782b229b25c
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393116672833