Comparison of valve durability among different transcatheter and surgical aortic valve prostheses: a network meta-analysis

Background Durability of different transcatheter heart valve (THV) is critical as the indication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) expands to patients with longer life-expectancy. Purpose We aimed to compare the durability of THV systems (balloon-expandable [BE] and self-expandable [SE]) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) prosthesis. Methods PUBMED and EMBASE were searched through February 2021 for randomized trials investigating parameters of valve durability after TAVR and/or SAVR in severe aortic stenosis. A network meta-analysis using random-effect model was performed. Synthesis was performed with 5-year follow-up data for echocardiographic outcomes and longest available follow-up data for clinical outcomes. Results Ten trials with a total of 9,388 patients (BE-THV: 2,562; SE-THV 2,863; SAVR:3,963) were included. Follow-up ranged from 1–6 years. SE-THV demonstrated significantly larger effective orifice area, lower mean aortic valve gradient (AVG), and less increase in mean AVG at 5-years compared to BE-THV and SAVR (Figure 1). Structural valve deterioration (SVD) was less frequent in SE-THV compared to BE-THV and SAVR (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07–0.27; HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.24–0.47, respectively) (Figure 1). Total moderate-severe aortic regurgitation and re-intervention was more frequent in BE-THV (HR 4.21, 95% CI 2.40–7.39; HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.16–4.26, respectively) and SE-THV (HR 7.51, 95% CI 3.89–14.5; HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.59–5.13, respectively) compared to SAVR. Conclusion TAVR with SE-THV demonstrated favorable forward-flow hemodynamics and lowest risk of SVD compared to BE-THV and SAVR at mid-term. However, both THV systems suffer an increased risk of aortic regurgitation and re-intervention, and long-term data from newer generation valve is warranted. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.