Back to Search Start Over

An Evaluation of Diagnostic Yield From Bronchoscopy

Authors :
Jing Huang
Lonny Yarmus
Giulia C. Kennedy
Alexander Chen
M. Patricia Rivera
Mary Brooks
Yoonha Choi
Lori Lofaro
Anil Vachani
Nicholas J. Pastis
Benjamin Bevill
Gerard A. Silvestri
Nichole T. Tanner
Source :
Chest. 157:1656-1664
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Background Bronchoscopy is commonly used to evaluate suspicious lung lesions. The yield is likely dependent on patient, radiographic, and bronchoscopic factors. Few studies have assessed these factors simultaneously while also including the preprocedure physician-assessed probability of cancer (pCA) when assessing yield. Methods This study is a secondary data analysis from a prospective multicenter trial. Diagnostic yield of standard bronchoscopy with biopsy ± fluoroscopy, endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), electromagnetic navigation, and combination bronchoscopies was assessed. Definitions for diagnostic and nondiagnostic bronchoscopies were rigorously predefined. The association of diagnostic yield with individual variables was examined by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses where appropriate. Results A total of 687 patients were included from 28 sites. Overall diagnostic yield was 69%; 80% for EBUS, 55% for bronchoscopy with biopsy ± fluoroscopy, 57% for electromagnetic navigation, and 74% for combination procedures (P 60% yielded a positive result in 77% (P Conclusions This study is the first to assess the yield of bronchoscopy according to physician-assessed pCA in a large, prospective multicenter trial. The yield of bronchoscopy varied greatly according to physician suspicion that cancer is present, the patients’ clinical/radiographic features, and the type of procedure performed. Of the procedures performed, EBUS-TBNA was the most likely to provide a diagnosis.

Details

ISSN :
00123692
Volume :
157
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Chest
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........d2485e6ad88a5ec361de4a85cdc473a7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.024