Influence of surgical intervention on neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with focal intestinal perforation

Background Intestinal perforation is known to correlate with neurodevelopmental outcome in very low-birthweight (VLBW) infants, and its two major causes are necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and focal intestinal perforation (FIP). Infants with FIP are reported to have better neurodevelopmental outcome than infants with NEC, but outcome has not been compared with that in infants without diseases that require surgery. The aim of this study was to compare neurodevelopmental outcomes between FIP survivors and infants without diseases that require surgery. Methods Records of VLBW infants with FIP and infants without surgical diseases were retrospectively analyzed. Neurodevelopmental outcome was compared between eight infants with FIP and 24 case-matched control infants without surgical diseases using the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development. Control group members were individually matched with FIP survivors for sex, gestational age, birthweight, and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade. Those with an episode of sepsis or severe IVH (grade 3–4) that occurred irrespective of FIP were excluded. Results Three FIP survivors and 12 infants without surgical diseases were classified as neurodevelopmentally normal (37.5% vs 50%, P = 0.69) at a corrected age of 18 months–3 years. All neurodevelopmentally normal FIP survivors were born at a gestational age ≥26 weeks. Conclusion Excluding the influence of sepsis or severe IVH, no significant difference was found in neurodevelopmental outcome between FIP survivors and infants without surgical diseases. None of the FIP infants born before 26 weeks of gestation, however, had normal neurodevelopment, suggesting that longer gestation might be needed to overcome the stress associated with FIP.