Back to Search Start Over

Introducing an Observational Rating System for Studying Concordance in Patient–Physician Relationships

Authors :
Drew A. Helmer
Kieran J. Maestro
Myrna L. Friedlander
Lisa M. McAndrew
Scott T. Wright
Nicole Da Silva
Hannah K. Muetzelfeld
Kelsey A. Kangos
Justin M. Kimber
Source :
The Counseling Psychologist. 47:796-819
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
SAGE Publications, 2019.

Abstract

We developed the System for Observing Medical Alliances (SOMA) to study relationships between medical providers and patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). Based on literature in health psychology, medicine, and the psychotherapeutic alliance, the SOMA operationalizes three medical alliance dimensions: Engagement in the Consultation Process, Trust in the Provider, and Concordance of Illness Beliefs and Treatment Recommendations. Specific behavioral indicators, tallied as observed by trained judges, are used as the basis for rating each dimension. In a sample of 33 medical consultations with veterans who had MUS, interrater reliabilities ranged from .79 to .94. Notably, the other dimension ratings accounted for 40% of the variability in Concordance, with Trust in the Provider contributing unique variance. In addition to research, psychologists in integrated health settings can use the SOMA to consult and train medical providers on communication skills that enhance concordance.

Details

ISSN :
15523861 and 00110000
Volume :
47
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Counseling Psychologist
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........ce03650f2a563e3d210950935c774e51