Back to Search Start Over

The effect of protective covers on pollinator health and pollination service delivery

Authors :
Lisa J. Evans
Juan David Lobaton
Romina Rader
Alistair Gracie
Brian T. Cutting
Melinda Simpson
Sophie E. Parks
Jeremy Jones
Manu E. Saunders
Carolyn A. Sonter
Katja Hogendoorn
Liam K. Kendall
C Spurr
Tobias J. Smith
Mark Hall
Vesna Gagic
Lindsay Kirkland
Megan Gee
Source :
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 319:107556
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Protective covers (i.e., glasshouses, netting enclosures, and polytunnels) are increasingly used in crop production to enhance crop quality, yield, and production efficiency. However, many protected crops require insect pollinators to achieve optimal pollination and there is no consensus about how best to manage pollinators and crop pollination in these environments. We conducted a systematic literature review to synthesise knowledge about the effect of protective covers on pollinator health and pollination services and identified 290 relevant studies. Bees were the dominant taxon used in protected systems (90%), represented by eusocial bees (e.g., bumble bees (Bombus spp.), honey bees (Apis spp.), stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini)) and solitary bees (e.g., Amegilla spp., Megachile spp., and Osmia spp.). Flies represented 9% of taxa and included Calliphoridae, Muscidae, and Syrphidae. The remaining 1% of taxa was represented by Lepidoptera and Coleoptera. Of the studies that assessed pollination services, 96% indicate that pollinators were active on the crop and/or their visits resulted in improved fruit production compared with flowers not visited by insects (i.e., insect visits prevented, or flowers were self- or mechanically pollinated). Only 20% of studies evaluated pollinator health. Some taxa, such as mason or leafcutter bees, and bumble bees can function well in covered environments, but the effect of covers on pollinator health was negative in over 50% of the studies in which health was assessed. Negative effects included decreased reproduction, adult mortality, reduced forager activity, and increased disease prevalence. These effects may have occurred as a result of changes in temperature/humidity, light quality/quantity, pesticide exposure, and/or reduced access to food resources. Strategies reported to successfully enhance pollinator health and efficiency in covered systems include: careful selection of bee hive location to reduce heat stress and improve dispersal through the crop; increased floral diversity; deploying appropriate numbers of pollinators; and manipulation of flower physiology to increase attractiveness to pollinating insects. To improve and safeguard crop yields in pollinator dependent protected cropping systems, practitioners need to ensure that delivery of crop pollination services is compatible with suitable conditions for pollinator health.

Details

ISSN :
01678809
Volume :
319
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........cd4087a89e20fef00fcb2fae9f6666d4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107556