Evidence that the anti-spasmogenic effect of theβ-adrenoceptor agonist, isoprenaline, on guinea-pig trachealis is not mediated by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase

The spasmolytic and anti-spasmogenic activity of β-adrenoceptor agonists on airways smooth muscle is thought to involve activation of the cyclic AMP/cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) cascade. Here we have tested the hypothesis that PKA mediates the anti-spasmogenic activity of isoprenaline and other cyclic AMP-elevating agents in guinea-pig isolated trachea by utilizing a number of cell permeant cyclic AMP analogues that act as competitive ‘antagonists’ of PKA. Anion-exchange chromatography of guinea-pig tracheae resolved two peaks of PKA activity that corresponded to the type I (∼5%) and type II (∼93%) isoenzymes. Pre-treatment of tracheae with zardaverine (30 μM), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) (1 μM) and the non-selective activator of PKA, Sp-8-CPT-cAMPS (10 μM), produced a non-parallel rightwards shift in the concentration-response curves that described acetylcholine (ACh)-induced tension generation. The type II-selective PKA inhibitor, Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS (300 μM), abolished this effect. Pre-treatment of tracheae with Sp-8-Br-PET-cGMPS (30 μM) produced a non-parallel rightwards shift of the concentration-response curves that described ACh-induced tension generation. The selective cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) inhibitor, Rp-8-pCPT-cGMPS (300 μM), abolished this effect. Pre-treatment of tracheae with isoprenaline (1 μM) produced a 10 fold shift to the right of the ACh concentration-response curve by a mechanism that was unaffected by Rp-8-Br-cAMPS (300 μM, selective inhibitor of type I PKA), Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS (300 μM) and Rp-8-pCPT-cGMPS (300 μM). We conclude that the anti-spasmogenic activity of Sp-8-CPT-cAMPS, zardaverine and VIP in guinea-pig trachea is attributable to activation of the cyclic AMP/PKA cascade whereas isoprenaline suppresses ACh-induced contractions by a mechanism(s) that is independent of PKA and PKG. British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 133, 1201–1212; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704213