Back to Search Start Over

There are differences in knee stability based on lateral extra-articular augmentation technique alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Authors :
Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas
Michael J. Alaia
Eoghan T. Hurley
Utkarsh Anil
Alexander Hoberman
Eric J. Strauss
David A. Bloom
Source :
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 29:3854-3863
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

The purpose of the current study is to systematically review and network meta-analyze the current evidence in the literature to ascertain if there is a superior lateral extra-articular augmentation technique in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL.R) with respect to knee stability, re-rupture rates and functional outcomes. The literature search was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Cohort studies comparing ACL.R to ACL.R + lateral extra-articular augmentation were included. Lateral extra-articular techniques included were anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALL.R), Cocker-Arnold, Lemaire, Losee, Maraccaci, and McIntosh. Clinical outcomes were compared between ACL.R alone and the different lateral extra-articular augmentation techniques using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis, with statistical analysis performed using R. The treatment options were ranked using the P-Score. Twenty-eight studies with a total of 2990 patients were included. ACL.R + Cocker-Arnold technique had the highest P-Score for ACL re-ruptures and residual pivot-shift. ACL.R + Cocker-Arnold, Lemaire, and ALL.R all significantly reduced the rate of ACL re-rupture, and residual pivot-shift, compared to ACL.R alone. There was no significant difference between any of the lateral extra-articular augmentation techniques and ACL.R alone. ALL.R had the highest P-Score for return to play, and return to play at pre-injury level. This study established that ACL.R + Cocker-Arnold, Lemaire and ALL.R resulted in significantly lower ipsilateral ACL re-ruptures, as well as reduced pivot-shift, compared to ACL.R alone. Whereas, the other lateral extra-articular augmentation techniques did not reduce pivot-shift and re-rupture. Additionally, functional outcomes and return to play were comparable between those who underwent ACL.R and lateral extra-articular augmentation and ACL.R alone. III.

Details

ISSN :
14337347 and 09422056
Volume :
29
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........ca5a09585d323438724c0eb2e61c9bb0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06416-4