Back to Search
Start Over
There are differences in knee stability based on lateral extra-articular augmentation technique alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- Source :
- Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 29:3854-3863
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.
-
Abstract
- The purpose of the current study is to systematically review and network meta-analyze the current evidence in the literature to ascertain if there is a superior lateral extra-articular augmentation technique in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL.R) with respect to knee stability, re-rupture rates and functional outcomes. The literature search was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Cohort studies comparing ACL.R to ACL.R + lateral extra-articular augmentation were included. Lateral extra-articular techniques included were anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALL.R), Cocker-Arnold, Lemaire, Losee, Maraccaci, and McIntosh. Clinical outcomes were compared between ACL.R alone and the different lateral extra-articular augmentation techniques using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis, with statistical analysis performed using R. The treatment options were ranked using the P-Score. Twenty-eight studies with a total of 2990 patients were included. ACL.R + Cocker-Arnold technique had the highest P-Score for ACL re-ruptures and residual pivot-shift. ACL.R + Cocker-Arnold, Lemaire, and ALL.R all significantly reduced the rate of ACL re-rupture, and residual pivot-shift, compared to ACL.R alone. There was no significant difference between any of the lateral extra-articular augmentation techniques and ACL.R alone. ALL.R had the highest P-Score for return to play, and return to play at pre-injury level. This study established that ACL.R + Cocker-Arnold, Lemaire and ALL.R resulted in significantly lower ipsilateral ACL re-ruptures, as well as reduced pivot-shift, compared to ACL.R alone. Whereas, the other lateral extra-articular augmentation techniques did not reduce pivot-shift and re-rupture. Additionally, functional outcomes and return to play were comparable between those who underwent ACL.R and lateral extra-articular augmentation and ACL.R alone. III.
- Subjects :
- Anterolateral ligament
Orthodontics
030222 orthopedics
medicine.medical_specialty
Sports medicine
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
business.industry
musculoskeletal, neural, and ocular physiology
Anterior cruciate ligament
medicine.medical_treatment
Significant difference
Treatment options
030229 sport sciences
musculoskeletal system
Return to play
03 medical and health sciences
surgical procedures, operative
0302 clinical medicine
medicine.anatomical_structure
Orthopedic surgery
medicine
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Surgery
business
human activities
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14337347 and 09422056
- Volume :
- 29
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........ca5a09585d323438724c0eb2e61c9bb0
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06416-4