Back to Search Start Over

T × W Completeness

Authors :
Franz von Kutschera
Source :
Journal of Philosophical Logic. 26:241-250
Publication Year :
1997
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 1997.

Abstract

T × W logic is a combination of tense and modal logic for worlds or histories with the same time order. It is the basis for logics of causation, agency and conditionals, and therefore an important tool for philosophical logic. Semantically it has been defined, among others, by R. H. Thomason. Using an operator expressing truth in all worlds, first discussed by C. M. Di Maio and A. Zanardo, an axiomatization is given and its completeness proved via D. Gabbay’s irreflexivity lemma. Given this lemma the proof is more or less straight forward. At the end an alternative axiomatization is sketched in which Di Maio’s and Zanardo’s operator is replaced by a version of “actually”.

Details

ISSN :
15730433 and 00223611
Volume :
26
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Philosophical Logic
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........c9d3170114dae3ffdfe11ac230009aa5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017942520078