Feasibility of Mastication-Structure-Sparing Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Although radiation-induced side-effects affecting mastication functionality have been studied in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy (RT), dose constraints for the associated structures are rarely included during treatment plan optimization. Previous research has identified several radiation dose relationships with mean dose thresholds around 30-40 Gy for masseter muscles, 40-50 Gy for pterygoid muscles, and 15-60 Gy for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) relating to a 10% trismus risk post RT. The purpose of this work was to use a multi-criteria optimization (MCO) approach to investigate to what extent doses to these structures can be lowered without violating existing clinical treatment goals in inverse planning of HNC RT. MATERIALS/METHODS This exploratory treatment planning study used data from 22 HNC patients treated to 68 Gy without mastication-structure-sparing intent in 2017-2019 at one institute in Sweden. Original volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were re-activated in the treatment planning system and masseter muscles, pterygoid muscles (medial and lateral), and TMJ were consistently delineated according to a previously reported delineation manual4. Re-planning was done using the MCO function of the treatment planning system with the resulting dose distribution normalized to match the clinical target volume (CTV T) mean dose of the clinical treatment plan. Dose differences between MCO and clinical plans were not allowed to exceed 2 Gy for any original clinical treatment goal unless tolerance doses had been substantially exceeded in the clinical treatment plan. To what extent dose to mastication structures could be lowered without violating existing clinical treatment goals were quantified by group and by patient. RESULTS Altogether, there were 334 clinical treatment goals in the clinical treatment plans (median = 15, range: 7-24 per patient, depending on tumor location), which easily could be met in the corresponding MCO plans. Mean doses to the mastication structures were in most cases below proposed tolerance doses in the clinical plan but could on average be further reduced between 3-5 Gy in the MCO plans (Table). Of the 25/88 patient reductions below 5 Gy (28%), 18/25 (72%) were for the masseter (n = 8) and medial pterygoid (n = 10) muscles. CONCLUSION With modern RT, it seems possible to reduce the dose to mastication structures below proposed trismus dose tolerance thresholds for most HNC patients without violating clinical treatment goals. Focusing on masseter and medial pterygoid muscle doses may prove to give the largest benefit in individual cases.