Back to Search Start Over

Phylogenetic relationships ofAmazonetta,Speculanas,Lophonetta, andTachyeres: four morphologically divergent duck genera endemic to South America

Authors :
Jeffrey L. Peters
Michael D. Sorenson
Mariana Bulgarella
Kevin G. McCracken
Robert E. Wilson
Source :
Journal of Avian Biology. 41:186-199
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
Wiley, 2010.

Abstract

We studied the phylogenetic relationships of four duck genera endemic to South America: Brazilian teal Amazonetta brasiliensis, spectacled duck Speculanas specularis, crested duck Lophonetta specularioides, and four species of steamer ducks Tachyerespatachonicus, T. leucocephalus, T. pteneres, T. brachypterus. Genetic divergence within and among species was compared using population-level sampling of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region, supplemented with three additional mtDNA genes and six independent nuclear loci from one individual of each species and a variety of outgroup taxa. The monophyly of these four morphologically divergent South American genera was strongly supported. Within this clade, Amazonetta and Speculanas were supported as sister species in all analyses, but different gene regions yielded conflicting or ambiguous results for Lophonetta and Tachyeres. This lack of resolution resulted from little informative variation in nuclear loci and high levels of homoplasy in the mtDNA control region. Control region sequences from the four Tachyeres species fell into two distinct clades. In one clade, T. patachonicus and T. leucocephalus share a set of closely related haplotypes (≤0.6% sequence divergence); while no identical haplotypes were shared between species, the control region phylogeny was insufficiently resolved to either support or reject reciprocal monophyly. The second clade, ~1.7% divergent from the first, comprised haplotypes of the Falkland Islands species T. brachypterus and a captive individual of T. pteneres. These distinctive South American ducks likely experienced two bouts of rapid diversification, thus making analysis of their phylogenetic relationships difficult. Incomplete lineage sorting, founder effects, and perhaps introgression likely have contributed to obscuring the relationships among steamer ducks.

Details

ISSN :
1600048X and 09088857
Volume :
41
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Avian Biology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........c4c522ff98d3386084e49da5a3db9d95