Back to Search
Start Over
Preferred Direction of Damage to Concrete Block Fences in the M6.7 Northridge Earthquake of 17 January 1994
- Source :
- Earthquake Spectra. 18:369-379
- Publication Year :
- 2002
- Publisher :
- SAGE Publications, 2002.
-
Abstract
- The Northridge earthquake toppled three times more concrete block fences that were oriented east-west than those oriented north-south. Toppled fences were twice as likely to fall to the north as to the south. This was discovered during damage causation studies for insurance companies in our survey of more than 200 single-family residences within 29 km of the epicenter. Two hundred nineteen fences were built within 11 degrees of either north (55%) or east (45%), providing an opportunity to study the effect of orientation. Of those fences that were completely toppled, 19 were oriented eastwest, while only 7 were oriented north-south. This preferred direction of damage for toppled fences was observed in all four quadrants about the epicenter and at distances of up to 17 km. In the NW quadrant, immediately above the aftershock zone, all toppled fences were oriented E-W, none were oriented N-S. The 58 fences oriented within 11 degrees of either NE or SE had no preferred direction of damage. In general, the failure rate for all 297 fences correlated with Modified Mercalli Intensity, location on alluvium as opposed to bedrock, and lack of structural reinforcement. [DOI: 10.1193/1.1484509]
- Subjects :
- 021110 strategic, defence & security studies
geography
geography.geographical_feature_category
Bedrock
0211 other engineering and technologies
Mercalli intensity scale
02 engineering and technology
Four quadrants
010502 geochemistry & geophysics
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Block (meteorology)
01 natural sciences
Geophysics
Epicenter
Seismology
Geology
Aftershock
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 19448201 and 87552930
- Volume :
- 18
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Earthquake Spectra
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........c3bcd52a1f4c9e7996b71c1dbb9262ee
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1484509