Interactions between functional groups in soft-substrata: Do species differences matter?

Interactions of two tubicolous, deposit-feeding polychaetes, Clymenella torquata (Leidy) and Polydora ligni Webster, with a filter-feeding bivalve, Gemma gemma (Totten), were examined to test the functional group hypothesis that small, filter-feeding bivalves with large young should attain high densities with tube-builders of any trophic mode because the large young escape predation by tube-builders. The prediction was not supported by Polydora and Gemma, since the two species have not been reported to coexist in high densities in nature. In laboratory experiments, Polydora reduced recruitment and adult survival of Gemma relative to a control. Polydora preyed on juvenile clams and reduced the time which adult clams had their siphons in the feeding position, relative to a control. For Clymenella and Gemma, the functional group hypothesis made the correct prediction (i.e. the two species are reported to coexist in high densities in nature), but for the wrong reason. The size of Gemma's offspring is not related to the intensity of Clymenella predation. Clymenella does not ingest Gemma since the worm does not usually feed from the zone occupied by the clam. In contrast to Polydora, Clymenella did not reduce the time which clams fully extend and open their siphons relative to a control. In laboratory experiments Clymenella increased adult bivalve growth, survival after one year, and recruit size after one month. Clam life history characteristics were similar in the Clymenella and Clymenella plus Polydora treatments because the number of surviving Polydora was reduced by a negative interaction with Clymenella. The tube-builders had different effects on the filter-feeder, Gemma, because these tube-building species differ in feeding position, diet and behavior. Thus, the functional group hypothesis was too general to predict and explain the species interactions and distributions.