Back to Search Start Over

Comparative effectiveness of heterologous booster schedules with AZD1222, BNT162b2, or mRNA-1273 vaccines against COVID-19 during omicron predominance in the Nordic countries

Authors :
Niklas Worm Andersson
Emilia Myrup Thiesson
Ulrike Baum
Nicklas Pihlström
Jostein Starrfelt
Kristýna Faksová
Eero Poukka
Lars Christian Lund
Christian Holm Hansen
Mia Aakjær
Jesper Kjær
Catherine Cohet
Mathijs Goossens
Morten Andersen
Jesper Hallas
Hinta Meijerink
Rickard Ljung
Anders Hviid
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2022.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of heterologous booster schedules with AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca, referred to as AZD), BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech, BNT), and mRNA-1273 (Moderna, MOD) vaccines compared with primary schedules and with homologous mRNA-vaccine booster schedules during a period of omicron predominance.DesignPopulation-based cohort analyses.SettingDenmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, 27 December 2020 to 28 February 2022.ParticipantsAdults that had received at least a primary vaccination schedule (ie, two doses) of the AZD, BNT, and/or MOD vaccines during the study period.Main outcome measuresUsing the Kaplan-Meier estimator, we compared country-specific risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes in heterologous booster vaccinated with primary schedule vaccinated (matched analyses) and homologous booster vaccinated (weighted analyses) since emergence of omicron.ResultsHeterologous booster schedules improved protection against all outcomes compared with primary schedules, with the largest and most robust effects observed for severe COVID-19. Risk differences for documented infection ranged from -22.4% to -3.1% (comparative vaccine effectiveness [CVE] 9.7% to 60.9%; >63.2% for COVID-19 hospitalisation) across countries for AZD1BNT2BNT3 (AZD as primary dose followed by two doses of BNT) vs AZD1BNT2 and -22.2% to -3.2% (CVE 37.4% to 67.8%; >34.6% for hospitalisation) for BNT1BNT2MOD3 vs BNT1BNT2, the two most common heterologous booster schedules. Heterologous- and homologous booster schedules had comparable effectiveness. Risk differences of documented infection ranged from -0.4% to 4.4% (CVE -20.0% to 2.4%) for AZD1BNT2BNT3 vs BNT1BNT2BNT3 and -19.8% to 1.7% (CVE -14.6% to 53.8%) for BNT1BNT2MOD3 vs BNT1BNT2BNT3; for most comparisons, risk differences for severe COVID-19 outcomes were smaller than 1 per 1000 vaccinated. Previous infection followed by a booster dose conferred the greatest protection.ConclusionHeterologous booster vaccine schedules are associated with an increased protection against omicron-related COVID-19 outcomes that is comparable to that afforded by homologous booster schedules.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........bceebbd9fdd1f40e80969631b9930d73
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.24.22282651