Back to Search Start Over

Discussion of Lev, Radhakrishnan and Zhang

Authors :
R. G. Walker
Source :
Abacus. 45:299-311
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
Wiley, 2009.

Abstract

It has been suggested that accountants do not resolve issues—that ‘we abandon them. We debate them loud and long . . . until another issue comes along that is more current and more controversial’ (Sterling, 1975). However, it is also clear that some issues are not entirely abandoned—they are recycled. Those issues are the subject of (seemingly) scholarly articles. They are debated with vigour, but then put to one side—only to re-emerge a generation or two later. For example, discussions about the choice of the ‘correct’ or ‘proper’ depreciation method occupied many pages of technical journals in the 1950s and 1960s (see, e.g., Reynolds, 1961)—and have been periodically revisited ever since (e.g., Burns, 1992; Howe, 2008)....

Details

ISSN :
14676281 and 00013072
Volume :
45
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Abacus
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........bca9baf9bdc55cfeb275f95025cfe030
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00290.x