Back to Search Start Over

Attempts to rescue yield loss in continuous canola with agronomic inputs

Authors :
T. K. Turkington
K. N. Harker
Elwin G. Smith
Newton Z. Lupwayi
Breanne D. Tidemann
M. Hartman
John T. O'Donovan
R. M. Mohr
Source :
Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 98:703-716
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Canadian Science Publishing, 2018.

Abstract

Recent canola acreage and production in western Canada have reached record high levels. Field experiments were conducted from 2014 to 2016 on land previously seeded to continuous canola for 6 yr at three Canadian Prairie sites. We determined that more intensive seed inputs, fertilizer, fungicide, tillage, or chaff removal could increase continuous canola yields compared with a “standard practice” (SP) treatment or match yields compared with canola in rotation. Recommended or 50% higher fertility levels alone or in combination with a higher seeding rate, tillage, chaff removal, or additional fungicide were applied to the same plots in three successive years to determine effects after 1, 2, and 3 yr of treatment imposition. In continuous canola, blackleg incidence and severity were both reduced by fungicide treatment. In rotations where canola was preceded by wheat, blackleg incidence and severity were much lower than in continuous canola. None of the treatments improved continuous canola yields compared with SP after a single year of treatment imposition. In subsequent years, canola yield increases compared with SP usually occurred as a result of additional fertilizer, seed, or fungicide. In the final year, canola yield loss due to continuous canola was largely rescued by additional seed and fertilizer. Without additional inputs, and when preceded by a different crop, canola yields averaged 11% greater than the average of all continuous canola treatments. High fertility regimes generally reduced oil content and increased protein content relative to standard fertility in continuous canola or relative to canola preceded by wheat.

Details

ISSN :
19181833 and 00084220
Volume :
98
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........b4bc1eaf6ea7d055eebd08c04031bd3c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2017-0337