Nitrogen uptake and regeneration (ammonium regeneration, nitrification and photoproduction) in waters of the West Florida Shelf prone to blooms of Karenia brevis

The West Florida Shelf (WFS) encompasses a range of environments from inshore estuarine to offshore oligotrophic waters, which are frequently the site of large and persistent blooms of the toxic dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis. The goals of this study were to characterize the nitrogen (N) nutrition of plankton across the range of environmental conditions on the WFS, to quantify the percentage of the plankton N demand met through in situ N regeneration, and to determine whether planktonic N nutrition changes when high concentrations of Karenia are present. In the fall of 2007, 2008, and 2009 we measured ambient nutrient concentrations and used stable isotope techniques to measure rates of primary production and uptake rates of inorganic N (ammonium, NH4+, and nitrate, NO3−), and organic N and carbon (C; urea and amino acids, AA) in estuarine, coastal, and offshore waters, as well as coastal sites with Karenia blooms present. In parallel, we also measured rates of in situ N regeneration – NH4+ regeneration, nitrification, and photoproduction of NH4+, nitrite and AA. Based on microscope observations, ancillary measurements, and previous monitoring history, Karenia blooms sampled represented three bloom stages – initiation in 2008, maintenance in 2007, and late maintenance/stationary phase in 2009. Nutrient concentrations were highest at estuarine sampling sites and lowest at offshore sites. Uptake of NH4+ and NO3− provided the largest contribution to N nutrition at all sites. At the non-Karenia sites, in situ rates of NH4+ regeneration and nitrification were generally sufficient to supply these substrates equal to the rates at which they were taken up. At Karenia sites, NO3− was the most important N substrate during the initiation phase, while NH4+ was the most important N form used during bloom maintenance and stationary phases. Rates of NH4+ regeneration were high but insufficient (85 ± 36% of uptake) to support the measured NH4+ uptake at all the Karenia sites although nitrification rates far exceeded uptake rates of NO3−. Taken together our results support the “no smoking gun” nutrient hypothesis that there is no single nutrient source or strategy that can explain Karenia's frequent dominance in the waters where it occurs. Consistent with other papers in this volume, our results indicate that Karenia can utilize an array of inorganic and organic N forms from a number of N sources.