Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and Tolerability of Isavuconazole versus Posaconazole for Fungal Prophylaxis after Lung Transplantation

Authors :
Luis F. Angel
Zachary N. Kon
Stephanie H. Chang
Melissa Lesko
D. Rudym
Tyler C Lewis
Kimberly Sureau
Source :
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 39:S203-S204
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Purpose Azole antifungals are commonly prescribed for fungal prophylaxis (ppx) following lung transplant, but have many side effects and drug interactions. Isavuconazole, a new broad-spectrum azole antifungal, may obviate these issues. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all lung transplant recipients (LTR) from February 2018 through September 2019 who received either ISA or POS for fungal ppx for 3 months post-transplant. Prior to February 2019 all patients received POS for ppx. Starting February 2019, POS was replaced by ISA at standard dosing. All patients received basiliximab induction and standard triple immunosuppression post-transplant. Surveillance bronchoscopies were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplant. Results In total, we reviewed 24 LTR who received ISA and 29 who received POS. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Median duration of follow-up was significantly shorter for the ISA group (137 vs. 340 days, p Conclusion Breakthrough fungal infections were similar between LTR receiving ISA or POS for fungal ppx. Longer follow-up of ISA patients is needed for definitive comparison of long-term infection risk. POS was discontinued in more patients due to drug interactions. ISA is a reasonable choice for primary fungal ppx in LTR.

Details

ISSN :
10532498
Volume :
39
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........b1789da150febc6de12747446ea82535
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.815