A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ASSESSING TRADITIONAL VERSUS DYNAMIC REHABILITATION REGIMES FOLLOWING SURGICAL REPAIR OF A PROXIMAL HAMSTRING TENDON AVULSION

Avulsion of the proximal hamstring tendon from the ischial tuberosity is an uncommon but significant injury. Recent literature has highlighted that functional results are superior with surgical repair over non-surgical treatment. Limited data exists regarding the optimal rehabilitation regime in post-operative patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the early interim patient outcomes following repair of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions between a traditionally conservative versus an accelerated rehabilitation regimen.In this prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) 50 patients underwent proximal hamstring tendon avulsion repair, and were randomised to either a braced, partial weight-bearing (PWB) rehabilitation regime (CR = 25) or an accelerated, unbraced, immediate full weight-bearing (FWB) regime (AR group; n = 25). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months after surgery, using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT), visual analog pain scale (VASP), Tegner score, and 12-item Short Survey Form (SF-12). Patients also filled in a diary questioning postoperative pain at rest from Day 2, until week 6 after surgery. Primary analysis was by per protocol and based on linear mixed models.Both groups, with respect to patient and characteristics were matched at baseline. Over three months, five complications were reported (AR = 3, CR = 2). At 3 months post-surgery, significant improvements (pEarly outcomes in an accelerated rehabilitation regimen following surgical repair of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions, was comparable to a traditionally conservative rehabilitation pathway, and resulted in better physical health-related quality of life scores at 3 months post-surgery. Further long term follow up and functional assessment planned as part of this study.