Back to Search Start Over

Randomized trial of a collaborative palliative and oncology care intervention to improve communication about end-of-life care in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Authors :
Vicki A. Jackson
Samantha M.C. Moran
Maya Anand
Charlotta Lindvall
Jennifer A. Shin
Heather Carlson
Angela Sousa
Joseph A. Greer
Jennifer S. Temel
Emily J. Gallagher
Areej El-Jawahri
Beverly Moy
Julia Carp
Simone Rinaldi
Mihir Kamdar
Juliet Jacobsen
Margaret Ruddy
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 38:1008-1008
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2020.

Abstract

1008 Background: Studies have demonstrated the benefits of early, integrated palliative care in improving quality of life (QOL) and end-of-life (EOL) care for patients with poor prognosis cancers. However, the optimal timing and outcomes of delivering palliative care for those with advanced cancers that have longer disease trajectories, such as metastatic breast cancer (MBC), remains unknown. We tested the effect of a collaborative palliative and oncology care model on communication about EOL care in patients with MBC. Methods: Patients with MBC and clinical indicators of poor prognosis (N=120) were randomized to receive collaborative palliative and oncology care or usual care between 05/02/2016 and 12/26/2018. The intervention entailed five structured palliative care visits, including a joint visit with oncology when possible, which focused on symptom management, coping, prognostic awareness, decision-making, and planning for EOL. The primary outcome was documentation of EOL care discussions in the electronic health record. Patients also completed questionnaires at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks regarding communication with clinicians about EOL care, QOL, and mood symptoms. Results: The sample included only women (100.0%) who mostly identified as white (87.5%), with a mean age of 56.91 years (SD=11.24). The rate of EOL care discussions documented in the health record was higher among intervention patients versus those receiving usual care (67.2% vs 40.7%, p=0.006), including a higher completion rate of a Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment form (39.3% vs 13.6%, p=0.002). Intervention patients were also more likely to report discussing their EOL care wishes with their doctor compared to usual care patients (OR=3.10, 95% CI: 1.21, 7.94, p=0.019). Study groups did not differ in reported QOL or mood symptoms. Conclusions: This novel collaborative palliative care intervention significantly improved communication and documentation regarding EOL care for women with MBC. Further work is needed to examine the effect of this care model on healthcare utilization at the end of life.

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
38
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........a69fb6116725c20104a5a465011fbdaa
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.1008