Back to Search Start Over

Protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing transperineal prostate biopsy to reduce infectiouscomplications

Authors :
Jim Hu
Alec Zhu
Andrew Vickers
Mohamad Ezzeddine Allaf
Behfar Ehdaie
Anthony Schaeffer
Christian Pavlovich
Ashley E Ross
David A Green
Gerald Wang
Serge Ginzburg
Jeffrey S Montgomery
Arvin George
John N Graham
Benjamin T Ristau
Andres Correa
Jonathan E Shoag
Keith J Kowalczyk
Tenny R Zhang
EM Schaeffer
Source :
BMJ Open. 13:e071191
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMJ, 2023.

Abstract

IntroductionApproximately one million prostate biopsies are performed annually in the USA, and most are performed using a transrectal approach under local anaesthesia. The risk of postbiopsy infection is increasing due to increasing antibiotic resistance of rectal flora. Single-centre studies suggest that a clean, percutaneous transperineal approach to prostate biopsy may have a lower risk of infection. To date, there is no high-level evidence comparing transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy. We hypothesise that transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia has a significantly lower risk of infection, similar pain/discomfort levels and comparable detection of non-low-grade prostate cancer.Methods and analysisWe will perform a multicentre, prospective randomised clinical trial to compare transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for elevated prostate-specific antigen in the first biopsy, prior negative biopsy and active surveillance biopsy setting. Prostate MRI will be performed prior to biopsy, and targeted biopsy will be conducted for suspicious MRI lesions in addition to systematic biopsy (12 cores). Approximately 1700 men will be recruited and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to transperineal versus transrectal biopsy. A streamlined design to collect data and to determine trial eligibility along with the two-stage consent process will be used to facilitate subject recruitment and retention. The primary outcome is postbiopsy infection, and secondary outcomes include other adverse events (bleeding, urinary retention), pain/discomfort/anxiety and critically, detection of non-low-grade (grade group ≥2) prostate cancer.Ethics and disseminationThe Institutional Review Board of the Biomedical Research Alliance of New York approved the research protocol (protocol number #18-02-365, approved 20 April 2020). The results of the trial will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed medical journals.Trial registration numberNCT04815876.

Subjects

Subjects :
General Medicine

Details

ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMJ Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........a5817b928d6e34e21e7ef4f9fa833152
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071191