Back to Search
Start Over
Prophylactic antibiotic regimens in dental implant failure
- Source :
- The Journal of the American Dental Association. 150:e61-e91
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors examine the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) and specific antibiotic regimens for prevention of dental implant failure in patients who are healthy overall. Types of Studies Reviewed The authors independently conducted electronic database and manual searches to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The authors selected articles on the basis of eligibility criteria and assessed for risk of bias by using the Cochrane Handbook. Implant failure was the primary outcome studied; perimucositis or implantitis, prosthetic failure, and adverse events were secondary outcomes studied. The authors conducted random effects meta-analysis for risk ratios of dichotomous data and used OpenMeta[Analyst] (Center for Evidence Synthesis, Brown School of Public Health) for qualitative assessment of administration schedules. Results With duplicates removed, the authors screened 1,022 abstracts, reviewed 21 full-text articles, and included 8 RCTs that included 2,869 implants in 1,585 patients. Meta-analysis results indicated that AP resulted in a statistically significantly lower number of implant failures for all regimens combined (implant, P = .005; patient, P = .002), as well as preoperative (implant, P = .01; patient, P = .007), pre- and postoperative (implant, P = .04), and postoperative AP only (implant, P = .02), compared with no antibiotics. The authors found no statistically significant differences in analysis of comparative antibiotic treatments or secondary outcomes. The authors identified confounding variables. Conclusions and Practical Implications Although meta-analysis results suggested that AP may reduce implant failure, definitive conclusions cannot be achieved yet. The overall nonsignificant differences reported in individual trials, limitations discussed, implant infection outcomes, and antibiotic-associated risks must be considered. Thus, the results for implant failure outcomes may not warrant the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in patients who are healthy who are receiving dental implants. Investigators must conduct large-scale RCTs to determine the efficacy of AP and various regimens, independent of confounding variables.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry
medicine.medical_treatment
Implant failure
Implant Infection
030206 dentistry
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Internal medicine
Meta-analysis
medicine
Number needed to treat
Implant
Antibiotic prophylaxis
Dental implant
business
General Dentistry
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00028177
- Volume :
- 150
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Journal of the American Dental Association
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........a429f9600f4ce4036375063c5911ccbe