Back to Search Start Over

Amrubicin (Amr) Versus Docetaxel (Dtx) As Second- or Third-Line Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Nsclc): a Randomized Phase III Trial

Authors :
Nobuyuki Katakami
Yasuo Iwamoto
Toshiyuki Harada
Kazuhiko Nakagawa
S. Kudoh
Hiroshige Yoshioka
Noriyuki Masuda
Hiroshi Tanaka
Hideo Saka
Hiroaki Okamoto
Kentaro Takeda
Tsuyoshi Takahashi
Naoyuki Nogami
Noriaki Sunaga
Masao Harada
Kenichi Chikamori
Nobuyuki Yamamoto
Takashi Seto
Source :
Annals of Oncology. 25:iv432
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2014.

Abstract

Aim: DTX is one of the standard drugs for patients (pts) with previously treated NSCLC. However, its efficacy seems insufficient. The efficacy of AMR for NSCLC has been previously reported. Thus, we conducted a randomized phase III trial comparing AMR to DTX, sponsored by Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd. Methods: We enrolled pts with NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1, undergoing second- or third-line treatment, and aged 20–74 years. Pts were classified by histology, prior treatment, and institution into 2 groups and then randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to treatment with AMR (35 mg/m2/day i.v., on days 1–3, q3w) or DTX (60 mg/m2/day i.v., on day 1, q3w). We planned a sample size of 100 patients per group, with a 2-sided alpha of 5% and power of 90%. We hypothesized a median progression-free survival (PFS) time of 3.3 and 2.0 months for AMR and DTX, respectively. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.03. Results: From October 2010 to June 2012, 202 pts were enrolled from 32 institutions. Patient characteristics were well balanced between both groups. OS was measured after a median follow-up of 13.5 months. Median PFS was 3.6 and 3.0 months with AMR and DTX, respectively (adjusted Hazard Rate (HR) 0.96, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.69–1.34, p = 0.831). Median OS was 14.6 and 13.5 months with AMR and DTX, respectively (adjusted HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.72–1.43, p = 0.933). ORR was 14.8% and 18.8% with AMR and DTX, respectively (p = 0.544). DCR was 55.7% for both AMR and DTX (p = 1.000). The most frequent adverse events (≥grade 3) for AMR and DTX were neutropenia (82.7% and 78.8%, respectively) and leukopenia (63.3% and 70.7%, respectively). Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the DTX arm: a case of interstitial pneumonia and another of drowning in a bath. Conclusions: We were not able to demonstrate superiority of AMR over DTX for PFS, despite the 20-day PFS prolongation. Our results suggest that AMR may become a treatment option for patients with previously treated NSCLC. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Details

ISSN :
09237534
Volume :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........a23be863dea746f8484ee2387cdc9c2d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu349.15