Back to Search
Start Over
Amrubicin (Amr) Versus Docetaxel (Dtx) As Second- or Third-Line Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Nsclc): a Randomized Phase III Trial
- Source :
- Annals of Oncology. 25:iv432
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2014.
-
Abstract
- Aim: DTX is one of the standard drugs for patients (pts) with previously treated NSCLC. However, its efficacy seems insufficient. The efficacy of AMR for NSCLC has been previously reported. Thus, we conducted a randomized phase III trial comparing AMR to DTX, sponsored by Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd. Methods: We enrolled pts with NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1, undergoing second- or third-line treatment, and aged 20–74 years. Pts were classified by histology, prior treatment, and institution into 2 groups and then randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to treatment with AMR (35 mg/m2/day i.v., on days 1–3, q3w) or DTX (60 mg/m2/day i.v., on day 1, q3w). We planned a sample size of 100 patients per group, with a 2-sided alpha of 5% and power of 90%. We hypothesized a median progression-free survival (PFS) time of 3.3 and 2.0 months for AMR and DTX, respectively. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.03. Results: From October 2010 to June 2012, 202 pts were enrolled from 32 institutions. Patient characteristics were well balanced between both groups. OS was measured after a median follow-up of 13.5 months. Median PFS was 3.6 and 3.0 months with AMR and DTX, respectively (adjusted Hazard Rate (HR) 0.96, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.69–1.34, p = 0.831). Median OS was 14.6 and 13.5 months with AMR and DTX, respectively (adjusted HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.72–1.43, p = 0.933). ORR was 14.8% and 18.8% with AMR and DTX, respectively (p = 0.544). DCR was 55.7% for both AMR and DTX (p = 1.000). The most frequent adverse events (≥grade 3) for AMR and DTX were neutropenia (82.7% and 78.8%, respectively) and leukopenia (63.3% and 70.7%, respectively). Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the DTX arm: a case of interstitial pneumonia and another of drowning in a bath. Conclusions: We were not able to demonstrate superiority of AMR over DTX for PFS, despite the 20-day PFS prolongation. Our results suggest that AMR may become a treatment option for patients with previously treated NSCLC. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
- Subjects :
- Oncology
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry
Surrogate endpoint
Hazard ratio
non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Hematology
Neutropenia
medicine.disease
Surgery
Docetaxel
Internal medicine
medicine
Progression-free survival
business
Amrubicin
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 09237534
- Volume :
- 25
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Annals of Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........a23be863dea746f8484ee2387cdc9c2d
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu349.15