Clinical Classifiers to Identify Ascending Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves

Objective: We aimed to develop clinical classifiers to identify prevalent ascending aortic dilatation in patients with BAV and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). Methods: This study included BAV (n=543) and TAV (n=491) patients with aortic valve disease and/or ascending aortic dilatation but devoid of coronary artery disease undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. We applied machine learning algorithms and classic logistic regression models, using multiple variable selection methodologies to identify predictors of high risk of ascending aortic dilatation (ascending aorta with a diameter above 40 mm). Analyses included comprehensive multidimensional data (i.e., valve morphology, clinical data, family history of cardiovascular diseases, prevalent diseases, demographic, lifestyle and medication). Results: BAV patients were younger (60.4±12.4 years) than TAV patients (70.4±9.1 years), and had a higher frequency of aortic dilatation (45.3% vs. 28.9% for BAV and TAV, respectively. PConclusions: Cardiovascular risk profiles appear to be more predictive of aortopathy in TAV patients than in patients with BAV. This adds evidence to the fact that BAV- and TAV-associated aortopathy involve different pathways to aneurysm formation and highlights the need for specific aneurysm preventions in these patients. Further, our results highlight that machine learning approaches do not outperform classical prediction methods in addressing complex interactions and non-linear relations between variables.