Abstract WMP56: Delay To Stroke Diagnosis In Patients That Require The Use Of An Interpreter

Introduction: Delay to stroke diagnosis can postpone appropriate treatment leading to worse outcomes. We hypothesize that interpreter use can contribute to a delay to treatment. Methods: We identified consecutive patients between January 2019 and June 2021 with acute stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic) using the Get with the Guidelines Database (GWTG). We determined the requirement for interpreter via chart review. We assessed time from last known well (LKW) to CT. We also looked at time to treatment, defined as the time from LKW to tPA administration or groin puncture. Finally, we assessed the difference in outcomes in patients using discharge modified Rankin Score (mRS). We compared these values for patients that did and did not require the use of an interpreter. Results: We identified 2,576 patients from GWTG and found 1,306 patients (mean age 69±16, 48% female) with acute stroke notifications. The majority (78%) of these patients were diagnosed with ischemic stroke. For patients presenting with an acute stroke, 27% required interpreter use. For patients who required an interpreter, Spanish (28%), Russian (21%) and Cantonese (18%) were the most common primary language. Compared to patients who spoke English, patients with interpreter requirements were older (73±13 years vs 68±16 years) and had a higher median NIHSS admission score (8[3-18] vs 4[2-13]), p Discussion: Interpreter requirement was associated with longer time to stroke diagnosis, reflecting a pre-hospital delay in the identification of stroke symptoms, despite the higher NIHSS. These patients were less likely to receive tPA and had a higher discharge mRS. Interpreter requirement merits consideration for systemic changes that might prevent this health care administration disparity.