Extractivismo forestal, centralismo neoliberal y Pobreza Estructural del Itata (Chile)

espanolLa provincia mas pobre de Chile coincide con el monocultivo forestal, domina dos tercios del territorio, predominando el extractivismo en el centro sur de Chile que, empobrecido por combinacion de monocultivo, neoliberalismo con baja tributacion, centralismo sin poder ni planificacion territorial, baja industrializacion y ausencia de fondos de convergencia, lo que impide el desarrollo endogeno. Grupo Angelini se quedo con la celulosa privatizada por Pinochet, la cual se expande por el mundo en un caso de transnacionalizacion por desposesion. Salir de la pobreza se vincula a limitar el extractivismo, alta tributacion local para diversificar economia, descentralizacion sustantiva y enfoque sustentable. EnglishThe poorest province of Chile coincides with the forest monoculture which dominates two thirds of the territory, predominant in the extractivism of the south-central zone of Chile, impoverished by the combination of monocultuve, neoliberalism with low taxation, centralism without power or territorial planning, low industrialization and the absence of structural convergence funds, which prevents endogenous development. The Angelini Group was left with the cellulose privatized by Pinochet, which expands around the world in a case of transnationalization by dispossession. The solution to this structural poverty is a mix of limiting extractivism, high local taxation to diversify the economy, substantive decentralization and a sustainable approach.